Comme d'habitude, je crains le pire pour le G1000, mais si on n'ai pas exigeant sur l'avionique (ce qui est tout à fait louable), la réplique de l'avion est remarquable.

Et bien si le C337 était correct, je veux pas volé les nouveaux  

J'attendais beaucoup de cette avion, aucun plaisir...

J'ai vu un commentaire sur le message FaceBook de Carenado avec une bonne question : quelle base de données est utilisé pour le G1000 et peut-elle être régulièrement mise à jour ? C'est pas vraiment le genre de machine pour faire du radada avec la carte dépliée sur les genoux.

Rien trouvé sur la page de Carenado

Special Features
Carenado G1000 (PFD and MFD) with GCU 475 Control Unit.
AFCS GMC 710 autopilot
NEW 3D knobs technology
Flight Plan creation option directly from the MFD
Windows lighting scratches effect
Volumetric side view prop effect
Dynamic propeller shines effect.
Cold and Dark start option

Features:
Carenado G1000 (Primary and multi-function displays) with GCU 475 Control Unit.
-Normal and Emergency Checklist on screen.
-TAWS and TCAS with visual and audible alerts.
-Fully customizable (AUX page included).
-Inset map with traffic, topographic and terrain awareness option.
-3 different wind option display.
-Special TBM 850 system page.
-MFD map with traffic, topographic and terrain awareness display option.
-Flight plan creation option directly from the MFD.
HD quality textures (2048 x 2048).
NEW 3D knobs technology.
3D gauges.
Knobs and switches sounds.
Original HQ digital stereo sounds recorded directly from the real aircraft.
Customizable panel for controlling windows transparency, instrument reflections and static elements such as wheel chocks and sights props.
Real behavior compared to the real airplane. Real weight and balance. Tested by real pilots.
Lighting rendering system. Landing, taxi, strobe and beacon.
illuminate objects and ground.
Cold and Dark or ready to taxi options for start the simulation.


**This aircraft does not have a complete 2D panel. Only the PFD, MFD and GCU 475 Unit have a 2D representation.

   
Included in the package:
5 HD liveries.
1 HD Blank livery
2 models (1 and 2 pilots on board)
Carenado G1000 PDF
TBM 850 Emergency Checklist PDF
TBM 850 Normal Procedures PDF
TBM 850 Performance Tables PDF
TBM 850 Reference PDF
Recommended Settings PDF

Source : http://www.carenado.com/CarSite/Portal/ … ;correl=85

Dernière modification par vbazillio (17-05-2013 09:24:05)

Quel est le probleme avec la base GPS par defaut de FSX, si celle-ci peut etre mise a jour ?
Je me doute que par defaut, le contenu du GPS de FSX doit etre assez pourri, mais qu'en est-il une fois que tout a ete mis a jour ?

Lorsque j'avais acheté le Sr22 j'avais updater la base de donnée pour voir.
Or il manquait beaucoup de choses pour les vols que je faisais, des axes de percée inexistant, des procédures d'approches non mises à jour, certaines d'entre elles n'existent plus en réalité mais sont présentes dans la database, ou alors certains waypoint ont été supprimés/changés mais la encore les changements ne sont pas représentés dans la database fsx.
De plus le coup du Cirrus Perspective sans les fonctionnalités complètes de ce dernier c'est moyen ...
C'est pour ça que je me méfie de ce TBM et attendrais des feedback.

Chez moi les Carenado sont les avions pour les petites balades sans prises de tête (que ce soit IFR ou VFR), ils sont simple mais font le boulot, et bizarrement , les productions les plus récentes SR22 (même avec les bémol cités ci-dessus) C90/B200, C340 et V35 sont les productions que je trouve les plus agréable
Bien sur cela n'est que mon avis, celui des autres est tout à fait compréhensible, il en faut pour tout le monde

Pour revenir sur le TBM, apparemment ils auraient rebosser un peu leurs G1000 (manipulation des knobs et fonctionnalités des pages) à voir, il serait vraiment intéressant qu'ils adaptent ces modif' pour leurs autres avions glass cockpit (sous forme de SP par exemple)

EDIT : Pour les bases de données GNSS je n'ai rien trouvé pour le GPS par défaut de fsx, peut-être n'ai-je pas fouillé assez

Re-Edit :
Un premier feedback sur Avsim

Hey guys, I just finished up my first flight in the new TBM 850 and I thought that I would share some notes that I took during the flight.  First off, this is a review from a real world prospective.  It's important to note that your simulator experience is exactly that...YOUR experience.  My experience is infused with real world training and recurrency, so my opinion of FS aircraft may differ from your own, and I will aslo focus on the real world application of the aircraft rather than computer performance and FPS.  All I know is that my computer is mean enough to run it, other than that, I can give little technical insight.  A quick background on my "expertise"  :huh: of the aircraft.....I am the assistant chief pilot for a corporate flight department of 4 (and growing) aircraft types based out of Knoxville, TN; including a Premier 1A, Pilatus PC-12, TBM 700/850, and SR22.  I also have a Beechjet type rating from a previous job.  I have been very patiently awaiting the release of this Carenado aircraft for training purposes.

PROs

*Beautiful exterior model (as expected with Carenado aircraft)

*Proper system modeling include: Electrical, Pressurization, and Fuel

     -I was very pleased to see that the fuel Auto/Man select switch is actually functioning with only one little hick-up I'll get to later

*The aircraft flies and feels very similarly to the actual aircraft when hand flying.  Steep turns, stalls, and maneuvering feel accurate and the appropriate power settings give the expected flight profiles.  And be forewarned, that last notch of flaps WILL make you balloon intensely.  I suggest trimming nose down as the last notch comes in at the 500ft call out, in the real aircraft and the sim!

CONs

*Systems*

     -Ignition

          - Incorrectly modeled.  Being that the AUTO and ON are modeled exactly the same.  The only way to get rid of your IGNITION annunciation is to turn it completely off, which is completely WRONG.

     -Inertial Separator

          -Engaging the INERT SEP switch will move a flap inside the engine intake to protect from FOD damage and icing.  One should see fluctuation in ITT and Torque when the switch is manipulated and the flap is in motion.  Unfortunately, by flipping the switch in the sim, it simply turns the INTER SEP annunciation on and off.  It actually changes absolutely NOTHING with the aircraft system.  It's a shame since it's kind of an important system in any turbo prop aircraft.

     -Aux Boost Pump

          -Similar to the ignition issue, having this on AUTO simply turns it on.  It is impossible to turn the annunciation off without turning the whole system off.  In the real world, this means a grounded aircraft!!  The ONLY light you should have on during take-off is a yellow INTER SEP light.

     -Auto/Man fuel select

          -While the system actually seems to work (not exactly sure if the proper tank switch times are down right), when going from AUTO to MAN, you should get a yellow AUTO annunciation making the pilot aware that the AUTO tank switch is now inop.  The sim doesn't show this.

     -Pitot/Static heat

          -No annunciation indication that the system is off, as there should be.

     -Pulsing Landing Lights

          -Completely inop

     -Overhead Gear Warning/Overspeed Aural Warning Test

          -Completely inop

     -G1000 :wacko:

          -Well.....yes, you CAN manually manipulate a flight plan from within the unit, BUT....unfortunately you can not add departures or arrivals.  Only waypoint to waypoint.  This is a step in the right direction but is still VERY far from being remotely 1/2 way functional.  Very simplified port of the Cessna 182T G1000.  Think I'm kidding....go into the the MFD (AUX page, tab 5) it says that the airframe IS the Cessna 182T  :lol:.  They literally pulled it out of one sim and pasted it into the TBM, put a fancy TBM home page on it and called it done.  They would have been much better off modeling a TBM 700 or early model 850 with the older avionics and allowed for the RXP import, similar to the King Airs and PA46

     -Start UP Procedures

          -This one really bothers me.  During the start up procedures, BEFORE taking the condition lever to low idle, one should observe a few things happening to the engine.  Most notable is: Starter-Ignition-Oil pressure rising-and Ng increasing.  The lack of an increasing Ng would indicate a locked up core and adding fuel would most definitely induce a hot start.  The sim shows NO Ng increase until you add fuel with the condition lever.  This is very poorly modeled.

So there you have it.  I could see using this model for air work and practice approaches, but as an accurate cockpit procedural training device, it leaves a lot to be desired.  Maybe some patches could be on the horizon?  If anybody has any questions or comments, feel free to post or PM.

Thanks

Seth Evans

Le topic complet ici

Dernière modification par FreeB!rd (17-05-2013 14:30:52)

Bonjour,
Et un SP2 est dispo pour le TBM 850.
Fonctions corrigées :


Released June 5th, 2013, 2030 GMT

Modifications:
-CAS messages adjusted.
-Some upper knobs operated backwards.
-TAS indicator adjusted in PFD.
-Several click spots were adjusted in PFD and MFD.
-Duplicate VOR selection fixed. (Previously always took the farthest)
-Auto fuel system adjusted.
-NG indicator showed incurred valued at startup.
-Flight Plan title now updates when deleting a flight plan.
-Pressurization values now are rounded (as the real aircraft).
-Many graphic display adjustment in PFD and MFD.

Ne tirez pas sur le pianiste !!!